Dumbly Craven

There are few practicing "journalists" nowadays who did not receive their indoctrination from a school of Jounmo-Socialism where they probably received high MARX. 

No matter whether it is a scrivener, an editor or a specialist in headline writing, they all give away the game in this manner:

When they report on or quote from R. Emmett Tyrrell, Lucianne Goldberg or Rush Limbaugh they always do so by preceding or anteceding the person's name with the  qualifying words "conservative talkshow host" or "right-wing editor" or "controversial writer/author".

It never fails. If any investigative journalist prints or reports any negative information about B.H. Obama or his cabinet members, said writer is immediately branded "controversial" or "right- wing".  This is the way Sharyl Atkisson became famous. Likewise, Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Brent Bozell.

But who has ever seen the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Daily News, TIME, Slate, Yahoo, Salon, or the National Journal use the locution "liberal candidate Hillary Clinton" or "left wing Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe".

Before his death, Mister Justice Antonin Scalia was never mentioned without the "Arch`Conservative" tag.  But Ruth B. Ginsburg has NEVER been called a "liberal" or "left wing" judge. (They were, incidentally VERY close and never spoke in those terms.)

But almost daily we read or hear about "archconservative Sen. Jeff Sessions" .

I think it is delicious evidence of just how venal and evil the majority of the media is.

By Jove, I hope they never change. They are so bloodthirsty in their bias, they do not see this omnipresent evidence -- in pixels as well as in black-and-white-- of just how dumbly Craven they are!